Recommended book: Against Feminism:; The Gender Feminist–New Left–Marxist Axis Attacks All Civil Society; Difference between men and Women (video)

Recommended book—SEE below

Below is a book I recommend. Joe Keysor (Kaiser) is a member of this blog, and has several other books that you can find on Amazon or other book sellers.

Open link on Amazon for the list of books by Joseph E. Keysor:

Open link

I only know one “feminist” who also advocates (strongly) the right of women to have abortions at their option. SHE IS NOT a member of this blog.

I made this blog post because of the previous post (SEE below). I will have something to say about men in an upcoming post.

Richard Duke

—

Book: Against Feminism: The Worldly Movement of Women's Liberation in the Light of Scripture

by Joseph Keysor (Author)

Amazon:

“In ‘Against Feminism’, Joseph Keysor argues from a distinctly Christian point of view that the Feminist revolution represents the wisdom of the world, and hence is inevitably contrary to many plain biblical teachings. This careful analysis of women in the Old and New Testaments reveals something very far from modern ideas of unisex and role reversal, first advocated by open opponents of Christianity. Feminists such as Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Marx and Engels, Lenin and Trotsky, Betty Friedan - their and others' teachings are studied and found to be very far from the cross and from the straight and narrow way of Jesus Christ. Keysor contends that Biblical Christianity offers women what the world does not see or know: forgiveness of sins; the Spirit of God; a constructive life of service to Christ (whether inside our outside of marriage); and eternal life in the kingdom of heaven. He says to those in the Church: ‘The world offers something very different - let's not make the wrong choice.’"

Open link for book

—

The Gender Feminist–New Left–Marxist Axis Attacks All Civil Society

Wendy McElroy

“Gender feminism, the New Left, and Marxism (FLM) are often said to be politically aligned, and, certainly, there is significant overlap. But does a political FLM axis exist?

The answer is important. A surreal dynamic has politicized every crevice of society and decent people now need to defend themselves against groundless accusations of racism, misogyny, and other ‘hate’ crimes in order to keep their jobs, their reputations, and their futures. An understanding of where the dynamic originates gives them more of a fighting chance. The answer begins with defining FLM and describing their interconnection.

(Of necessity, the ensuing analysis is highly simplified.)

Gender feminism became prominent in the 1970s and ’80s. It is called ‘gender’ feminism because this form of feminism explains the world by dividing men and women into antagonistic classes. Also known as third wave feminism, its ideological successor is sometimes called fourth wave feminism; it focuses on equity for women and minorities, the use of social media as a political weapon, and on intersectionality.

The New Left was a broad coalition of liberals, radicals, and unorthodox Marxists in the 1960s. The word ‘New’ distanced it from pure Marxism and the Old Left which focused on labor. By contrast, the New Left championed cultural causes such as feminism and gay rights. This is a Maoist approach to revolution—a cultural revolution to change ‘the system’ by upending the traditions and institutions upon which everything else rests. That’s why the New Left was sometimes called the counterculture. Social justice emerged in its wake.

Marxism is the theory and practice of communism; it advocates class warfare as a path to a society in which there is no private property and goods are available based on need. The different schools of communism are united by some core beliefs. Two of them: capitalism is exploitation, and people are defined by their class affiliation.

All three movements condemn capitalism and believe that people are their ‘identity’—their race, for example. ‘Identity’ is now the word preferred over ‘class’ but the words mean basically the same thing. Because class is a fundamental concept to FLM and their successors, examining how it is handled can test how closely they are aligned politically.

A class is a group of people who share a common characteristic that serves the purpose of whoever is doing the grouping. A cancer researcher may group subjects according to types of cancer, for example. FLM all approach class for the purpose of forging ideology and political revolution. They all use relational class analysis, in which a class is defined by its relationship to an institution. Marx used the relationship to ownership of production to divide people into capitalists and workers.”

Open link for complete article

—

—

SEE:

—