Shocking NEW Documents Expose Multi-Front Effort To Protect Clintons While Framing Trump; Ethics Complaint Filed Against Hillary Clinton’s Law License Over Role in Russia Collusion Hoax
Shocking NEW Documents Expose Multi-Front Effort To Protect Clintons While Framing Trump
“IRS agents reviewed the evidence, and at least one agent concluded it meant that the "entire [Clinton Foundation] enterprise is a fraud."
Newly unearthed documents show deep state government actors once again circling the wagons to protect Bill and Hillary Clinton — and suppressing evidence that implicated them. Last week it was the FBI, this week it is the IRS.
In 2019, the IRS Criminal Investigations Division quietly launched a probe into the Clinton Foundation's tax practices, working closely with whistleblowers John Moynihan and Larry Doyle, financial experts who had compiled thousands of pages of evidence.
According to internal agency memos reported by Just the News, IRS agents reviewed the evidence and at least one agent concluded it meant that the "entire [Clinton Foundation] enterprise is a fraud." Agents then moved to treat the whistleblowers as cooperating witnesses and even set up secure computer servers to hold the material they had collected.
Then, without warning, the lights went out. "Can't talk about the CF," agents told the whistleblowers. By the summer of 2019, their inquiry was dead. Moynihan and Doyle are now battling the agency in Tax Court over the apparent shutdown of the investigation.
The IRS's abrupt reversal follows an earlier, more infamous pattern. In 2016, FBI field offices in New York, Washington, and Little Rock all opened probes into the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation, partly on the strength of Peter Schweizer's 2015 bestselling book, Clinton Cash, which exposed numerous examples of the Clintons using the foundation while she served as Secretary of State under President Barack Obama as a pay-to-play scheme for business and foreign government interests seeking political influence.
The book told the story of Uranium One, a US mining company that was sold to the Russians after investors pledged more than $100 million to the Clinton Foundation. That story was confirmed in a front-page story by the New York Times when the book was published and based on its material.
The FBI field office investigations were proceeding until they were ordered by higher-ups to stop. Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates ordered prosecutors to "shut it down." Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe required his personal approval for every investigative step — effectively choking the cases.
The fallout from Clinton Cash was real. Clinton staffers scrambled for advance copies of the book, while Hillary's own pollsters flagged the Uranium One deal as her campaign's biggest vulnerability in the early primary states. By January 2016, the FBI was looking into the book's allegations — until the brakes were pulled.
Appearing on an OANN program this week, Schweizer told host Matt Gaetz that the government's double standard is unmistakable. "At the same time, they are killing an organic investigation into Clinton corruption… they were also creating a completely fictional investigation tying [Donald] Trump to Russia," he said.
Open link for complete article
—
Ethics Complaint Filed Against Hillary Clinton’s Law License Over Role in Russia Collusion Hoax
“Let’s be honest here—we all know Washington insiders have operated by different rules than the rest of America for decades. While ordinary citizens face consequences for their actions, the political elite seem to glide above the law. They’re protected by connections and influence. But sometimes, accountability arrives through unexpected channels. Not from federal prosecutors or congressional committees, but from the quiet corners of professional licensing boards where politics holds less sway.
The wheels of justice may turn slowly in the nation’s capital, but they’re beginning to turn nonetheless. Remember when we were told this was all a conspiracy theory? What many assumed would remain buried in classified files and partisan memory is now emerging into daylight. And it’s forcing a reckoning that no amount of political maneuvering can prevent.
Recently, Democracy Restored filed a formal ethics complaint with the Arkansas state bar targeting Hillary Clinton’s law license. This government watchdog group is dedicated to “shedding light on the actions of unelected bureaucrats.” They want a comprehensive review of the former Secretary of State’s conduct during the 2016 presidential campaign. Specifically, her role in what has become known as the Russia collusion hoax against President Donald Trump.
The filing cites violations of Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct involving “Dishonesty” and “Prejudice to the Administration of Justice.” Yeah, that’s lawyer-speak for “she lied and messed with the legal system.” According to the complaint, newly declassified documents reveal Clinton’s direct involvement in spreading lies during one of the nastiest elections in American history.
Years of Deception Finally Exposed
Here’s what really gets me about this timing. Recently declassified documents have shed new light on Clinton’s actions during the 2016 campaign. The complaint alleges these documents contain “an annex, which suggests that Clinton approved a plan created by one of her advisors to release false information.” The purpose? To “smear” her political opponent during a presidential campaign.
This revelation demands scrutiny not just from political observers, but from the legal profession itself. The complaint notes that Clinton used “unverified” and “unvetted” information on purpose to “injure her political opponent” during the election campaign. The watchdog group argues that Clinton “personally signed off on an effort to amplify this bad intelligence to the media and federal law enforcement.”
What This Means for Justice
The Arkansas Supreme Court Office of Professional Conduct has confirmed they got the complaint. A spokesperson said it “will be processed as all complaints are.” While criminal charges haven’t been filed, the complaint emphasizes something important. Clinton’s actions may have violated American Bar Association rules. These are the rules about lawyers who “commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer.”
Ask yourself—would you keep your professional license if you did this?
—