The definition of "conspiracy"
The changing of definitions in order to cause the mass of people from understanding what is going on is disgusting and sickening. Often the changing of definitions results in allowing harmful actions to occur and continue. For example, the definition and meaning of “inflation” was changed from creation of currency and credit out of thin air to a rise in prices. A general rise in prices CANNOT occur unless more currency and credit are created out of thin air; but the public is mislead by the changed definition. (I hope one can see how easily he or she can be tricked if he or she does not do some critical thinking and accepts everything heard from the mass.)
Another example is that “liberal” meant freedom from the government and that meaning and definition was changed to being in favor of the government.
Another is the change of the word conspiracy.
What do you think about when you hear the word or say the word: conspiracy? Probably it is wrong just like the changed meanings of inflation and liberal are wrong.
Definition of a conspiracy:
Conspiracy as defined by Webster’s New World Dictionary as “a planning and acting together secretly, especially for an unlawful or harmful purpose.”
Those who sought truths about these so-called “vaccines” (they don’t meet the definition of vaccines un the patents) and found truths WERE NOT CONSPIRATORS. The state and Big Pharma, the news media, and the mass of institutions WERE THE CONSPIRATORS. Much was covered up including no right to sue Big Pharma for deaths or injuries. The mass of people believed the state and Big Pharma, the news media, and the ridiculous advertisements, and got the jabs. We now know that covid-19 does not stop one from getting the virus and from spreading it. So, the reality of the jab (not vaccines under the patents) meets the true definition of a conspiracy or conspiracies. The mass believed conspirators; and the remnant who sought the truth were accused by those who don’t know what a conspiracy is. Typical action by the mass of people.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb gives great advice when he writes that when one reads or hears something, he must ask questions such as: who does he work for; who is paying him to write or say this? Taleb writes that if you see ANY conflict, quit reading that writer or listening to that person. He is in a conflict and must be avoided or seriously researched for his lack of influence from a third party or parties.
Coaches were supporting and advertising the taking of the so-called vaccine. These coaches were learned ignoramuses. The coaches know much about sports (learned) but nothing about so-called vaccines (ignoramuses). These coaches had no clue of what they were talking about. They trusted the state and Big Pharma, which we now know was a mistake to advertise. I have heard no apologies.
Most pastors tucked tail and ran. They could have stood together. So, if they will not stand against the state, do you expect them to stand for Jesus? Remember that Jesus was crucified by Rome (state) and the experts of the law (Pharisees). Rome and Pharisees: two governments.
Richard Duke
—
Natalie F Danelishen @Chesschick01
This isn't a pandemic. It's a religion and people are worshiping at the altar of The State.
—
—
—